No? I thought so.
Well, Autodesk seem to think that they have fixed stairs and railings in v2018. Well, yes, the new multistorey stair tool is a great improvement on the old system, and it has certainly improved how it handles railings. But there is an awful long way still to go, particularly with railings.
Autodesk are now taking user input to the Revit Ideas website very seriously - yes they are listening to our requests on that site, and the number of votes really makes a difference.
Here is what we need to do: vote for all those stair and railing issues that urgently need attention.
I have looked through the list of ideas on the website. Since it is quite hard to navigate through all those duplicate ideas and requests for things that already exist (where people just need a bit more training), I will try to make it easier for you by creating a few links to ideas that I think need to be voted up. I was going to wait until I had comprehensively reviewed all the wishlist items, and gone through all my own requests and comments on this blog in the past, then added some more wishlist items - but I think it is too important to wait. I will add to this list in due course.
Please add your votes to any ideas that you support:
Stairs
Stair annotation:- Allow rename or delete of stair path system family; Fix stair path arrows so that we can quickly add a path to multiple views
- fix the broken Copy & Paste function for stair path arrows.
- "Show hidden linework" function should work on component stairs (actually it used to work on the old sketch stairs, but is broken on component stairs). This is doubly important now that the old stair by sketch command has been removed from v2018.
- Ability for stairs below to obey view range (or cut mark on stairs going down?)
- Component stair end in landing option
- Automatically cut a hole in floor above when creating a stair? Too dangerous? Or a good idea?
- Stairs - More Functionality - this one is a repost of the original request that gathered much support but was labelled as 'Implemented' by Autodesk when multistorey stairs were imporoved in v2018. The author does not consider any of its content to be implemented - (core & finish layers to stairs, more parameters, control over end conditions etc)
- Allow stairs to join structural elements such as beams
- Allow stairs and ramps to join walls and floors (same deal as above but it has lots of votes already)
- Allow Boolean Cut Void operations on stair components - so we can create irregular shaped stairs & landings without converting them to sketches
Railings
Railings Generally- Railing Overhaul - Resolution of Limitations - This is a comprehensive request to fix many things about railings from Chris Price (Mr Spot), who is an expert on Revit railings
Railing view properties
- Make railing terminations visible in plan view
- Allow railings to be visible in a Reflected Ceiling Plan -
- Schedule Railing posts and balusters
- Please make Railings more user friendly -
- Railing baluster spacing 'Shrink Pattern to Fit' option
- Unchained Railings - allow a break in the railing sketch
- Start and End Indents on Handrail Support Spacing
- Horizontal rails to have start and end indent/offset (to match start/end baluster space)
More to be added soon . . . .
done... it is called lobbying... but that is for the cause...
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot for compiling this list, Tim. I will cast my votes now.
ReplyDeletePlease also consider voting "Groups need to be stable, please" up.
This one is giving me even more headaches than the stairs:
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/groups-need-to-be-stable-please/idi-p/6599569
Cheers,
Jan
The railing improvements described in these ideas could be used for so many more things if we could only change the category, they then could be used for placing repeating component systems that follow rules, such as rainscreen support systems, cappings with support bracketry etc.
ReplyDeleteI think it's great you're using your blog as a platform to direct people to interesting ideas!
ReplyDeleteOne item I would add, would be the same thing I would add to most system creation tools, that is, the ability to change the category of the resulting system as these kinds of tools are used to create many more things than the category for which they where inteneded.
ReplyDeleteDarren