The reason for my current detour is to do some research for the conference - to learn from one of the great masters of architectural detailing, renowned Sri Lankan architect Geoffrey Bawa. He has designed many beautiful buildings by perfectly managing spaces, repeating patterns and a great attention to detail - all with an elegant simplicity.
At the conference I will be presenting a lab session on stairs and railings (afternoon on day one), so I have been paying close attention to handrail details. Some of Bawa's details are very chunky, as per the style of the time - but they still look good several decades later.
Sometimes Bawa's details are less elegant than whimsical - in fact can be downright scary, but those examples are few and far between:
 |
| 5-headed cobra handrail termination |
Railing Transitions
Handrail transitions at half landings have always been a problem for Revit to achieve neatly, but with the changes to railings in v2013 the situation actually got worse - if you try to use the new Top Rail or Handrail features. Revit seems to require lots of extra horizontal space to make the turns - as documented previously - Top Rail Transitions and Top Rail Offsets.Geoffrey Bawa detailed his handrails to transition perfectly where they turned a corner without the extra horizontal lengths that Revit insists on, as seen below:
 |
| Revit Transitions |
 |
| Bawa Transitions |
If Bawa and his craftsmen could do it perfectly, why can't Revit? Revit should learn from a great master.
Simple : because Revit was not made by seniors drafters and architects.
ReplyDeleteYou are mistaken, it was...and still is.
ReplyDeleteYour claim suggests all architects and drafting staff agree on everything. I think there is plenty of evidence that isn't true, though I'm confident a majority of Revit users would agree railings could improve.
What the developers and designers of Revit ARE guilty of is not placing a high enough priority on design tools for railings, for far too long.
Tim - Revit lacks some finishing tools like sandpaper, rasp, and putty. :)
ReplyDeleteOh, and a trowel and broom for finishing concrete.
Dont get me wrong, but are those developpers kept the pace on construction reality?
ReplyDeleteI mean, i could teach architecture for years with a rough idea of how technicaly detaillings and assemblies are and call myself senior, but the reality if far from those theories and books.
I can take for example stair's components , but i could also mention the case for curtain-wall, mullions, curtain panels, finishes and so on.
These are TOOLS in Revit, though by somes and with a particuliar process and not always that much adaptable to different firm's practices.
We, architects, have to bend the tool.